Re: Hinting regression in Ubuntu 23.04
Martin van Es <[email protected]> Thu, 04 May 2023 08:56:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.freetype.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <23715226.ouqheUzb2q@minivanes> |
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:45:21 PM CEST Werner LEMBERG wrote: > I've just tested a self-compiled version of current git, together with > the `ftview` demo program, using UbuntuMono-R.ttf (version 0.8, last > modified 2011-09-26). Attached is a screenshot of the following call > > ftview -kA5 -e unic 16 UbuntuMono-R.ttf > > This is B/W monochrome rendering with full hinting. As can be seen, > the result is just fine. I'm quite confident that the problem is > *not* with FreeType. This is a regression from 22.10 to 23.04 and Ubuntu(-mono) has seen some changes since 22.10, so let's compare the same font, because I do suspect weird (libfreetype?) behaviour on Ubuntu 23.04 which I can't explain. Attached is a screenshot of OpenSans-VariableFont_wdth,wght.ttf using the same commandline. It clearly shows bad hinting and I'm convinced this looked better hinted on 22.04, so I suspect it will look correct on your system too? https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Open+Sans I also attach the hinted non-AA ftinspect view of the same font. ftview and ftinspect were compiled against freetype 2.13.0. As far as I can tell, I'm using libfreetype 2.13.0 to render fonts on my system (I don't know whether that's important for ftview and ftinspect?) Martin
OpenSans-VariableFont_ftinspect.png
(image/png, 60.5 KB) - not displayed
OpenSans-VariableFont.png
(image/png, 24.3 KB) - not displayed