Re: Synchronous method in asynchronous signal callback
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1512255.cqeFBynFun@tjmaciei-mobl4> |
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 10:12:40 Havoc Pennington wrote:
> GLib's "do not handle OOM" policy is correct for the 99% case. Many
> who believe they should be handling OOM are probably wrong. And of
> those who should be, many are probably making a token effort that's
> broken in practice.
You should have seen the reaction in the C++ committee discussion mailing list
when we said that handling OOM was pointless... (in moderately complex
applications running on modern operating systems, I didn't generalise).
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
_______________________________________________
dbus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus