RE: DBus usage for applications and services communication through servicemanager
Ravi Kumar Kandati <Ravikumar.Kandati-Ac2DoP1UAlJCvBQ4VRQNtEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BMXPR01MB0966049F97AADE9AAEF43DAFE9C10@BMXPR01MB0966.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Thanks for the reply. Are you suggesting single D-bus connection for SM. In this case there will be delay in processing priority requests when the applications and services increases. -----Original Message----- From: dbus [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DBus usage for applications and services communication through servicemanager On Thursday, 15 June 2017 02:36:47 PDT Ravi Kumar Kandati wrote: > SM will be having dedicated D-Bus connection to > receive requests from Applicatios(App1, App2, App3 ...) SM will be > having different D-Bus connections to handle responses coming from > different services(Ser1, Ser2, Ser3 ...) > > Can you guide is the above implementation procedure is fine or any > better implementation? I'd simply make the calls non-blocking. You don't need separate processes or separate connections. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus L&T Technology Services Ltd www.LntTechservices.com<http://www.lnttechservices.com/> This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s). If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system. _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus