Re: D-Bus service activation and access control
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2241639.EL5yAx0Szg@tjmaciei-mobl1> |
On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 19:14:23 PDT Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > But would that wrapper be something the library developers themselves > would use? If not, then it might not be maintained as well as the > underlying library. And then the quality of other language bindings > suffers as well. > > Better to have the core of the library in C. Because that’s common code > that everybody is using heavily, you know it will be well-maintained. That requires that the core developers are equally able to maintain a C library as they maintain a C++ one, even assuming that you can actually get people to stay at all. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus