Re: ICCCM vs. technology pimping (was: Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made)

--===============0273383188==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kr6QJ6xGUOmSrVQA"
Content-Disposition: inline


--kr6QJ6xGUOmSrVQA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:50:57AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts on the merits of one versus the other?  My
> current thoughts are that going with an fd.o ICCCM would be an
> incredible waste of an opportunity.  There are others that think
> differently, however (hi dude!), and if they want to expound on this in
> public, that'd be fantastic.

That being said, I do also see the call for fd.o ICCCM.

--=20
Daniel Stone                                            <daniel@freedesktop=
=2Eorg>

--kr6QJ6xGUOmSrVQA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBi74ZcPClnTztfv0RAklPAJ9cQOImDT7WMXYKAJ+purJE7l8JRwCggw/3
IkqpEeQ8Ndyt99TcgHlefSI=
=vMAH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kr6QJ6xGUOmSrVQA--

--===============0273383188==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
platform mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform

--===============0273383188==--