Re: hey, remember the platform?
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:43:10 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0986797265== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11680876.DLdfepSvsr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart11680876.DLdfepSvsr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 30 June 2005 11:57, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > and cairo isn't being used in KDE, so it's > >right out of any list of de-facto adopted code. > > Just curious what would change your view of this (not > questioning it, it still seems too early to me as well). > Is "in KDE" always a requirement? I'm hearing a lot of > pretty key apps starting to use cairo, including > OpenOffice and Firefox - it's not mainstream for either > AFAIK. Does something like that end up tipping the > balance? I think not being adopted by a toolkit with roughly 50% deployment as the=20 system's primary toolkit, is a pretty clear indicator that cairo does not=20 belong to the set of software required for building a modern desktop. That's is not an indictment of cairo, or of qt. Read that as a statement o= f=20 the intent of the platform. =2D ajax --nextPart11680876.DLdfepSvsr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCxCEiW4otUKDs0NMRAktwAKDUZxXWUPSSwRGqDvzNgFOlx1CFgwCgxZDK /tXnlFpjIo6whP+Tzy416qE= =Zwk3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11680876.DLdfepSvsr-- --===============0986797265== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ platform mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform --===============0986797265==--