Proposed: libxml2 OR expat
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:52:35 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 09:51:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > I'm proposing EITHER OF libxml2 or Expat with this mail. > > Rationale: > XML is one of the most important technologies to have emerged in the > last few years. It is very widely-used (not just in the enterprise, but > also in GNOME and IIRC KDE). I strongly believe one of the core > components of our platform must be an XML library. > > However, this is a relatively complicated proposal: I do not know the > merits of libxml2 vs libexpat. I seem to recall libexpat being smaller, > but libxml2 enjoying far wider use. ... ah, Expat doesn't support DOM or SAX. Between this and the wider-use thing, my personal choice would lie towards yes for inclusion, and libxml2 over Expat. -- Daniel Stone <[email protected]> freedesktop.org: powering your desktop http://www.freedesktop.org _______________________________________________ platform mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCt9DcPClnTztfv0RAg8MAJ9cTz+UwyRYzOzQRXwoS1j+LSB5CgCeONSR bKuAd6Sdni5LIwKxXB7ml5U= =ndHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----