Proposed: libxml2 OR expat

Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:52:35 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 09:51:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I'm proposing EITHER OF libxml2 or Expat with this mail.
> 
> Rationale:
> XML is one of the most important technologies to have emerged in the
> last few years. It is very widely-used (not just in the enterprise, but
> also in GNOME and IIRC KDE). I strongly believe one of the core
> components of our platform must be an XML library.
> 
> However, this is a relatively complicated proposal: I do not know the
> merits of libxml2 vs libexpat. I seem to recall libexpat being smaller,
> but libxml2 enjoying far wider use.

... ah, Expat doesn't support DOM or SAX.

Between this and the wider-use thing, my personal choice would lie
towards yes for inclusion, and libxml2 over Expat.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                            <[email protected]>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop                http://www.freedesktop.org

_______________________________________________
platform mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCt9DcPClnTztfv0RAg8MAJ9cTz+UwyRYzOzQRXwoS1j+LSB5CgCeONSR
bKuAd6Sdni5LIwKxXB7ml5U=
=ndHa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----