Re: query: are we doing printing?
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:12:05 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1492691958== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UEYxRAcbr7cS1UOX" Content-Disposition: inline --UEYxRAcbr7cS1UOX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 12:10:51PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > Are things that are are for printing (CUPS, ghostscript) in scope? Printing would be nice, but I'm not sure that we have anything sufficiently standard to propose. If I was going to throw anything up, it would certainly be CUPS, but I'm honestly not sure it's ready. That said, it seems to be the default for GNOME and KDE. Maybe once Mozilla kicks Xprint to the curb, it can be the truly standard printing solution. Next release, I suspect. :) d --=20 Daniel Stone <daniel@freedesktop= =2Eorg> freedesktop.org: powering your desktop http://www.freedeskto= p.org --UEYxRAcbr7cS1UOX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCxwVcPClnTztfv0RAjjDAJ9XeQYctFnBBrSQaprd9FkfA3e8FQCbBvWt 4mSW/dyvGb9YAaF+4wGEbo4= =Y+F4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UEYxRAcbr7cS1UOX-- --===============1492691958== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ platform mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform --===============1492691958==--