Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec

--===============1201713090==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mCdhXfk5CmamXiy1"
Content-Disposition: inline


--mCdhXfk5CmamXiy1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 01:22:09AM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 20:11, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I'm proposing systemtray-spec with this mail.
>=20
> I vote no, the spec sucks, it's far too policy-free and thus not
> genuinely interoperable.

Fair enough.

Do we have any alternatives coming up for this sort of notification?

--=20
Daniel Stone                                            <daniel@freedesktop=
=2Eorg>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop                http://www.freedeskto=
p.org

--mCdhXfk5CmamXiy1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBDH7CcPClnTztfv0RAhuyAKCRPzXXQRVN9u5zJ3HQ5HZoy7FbBwCeOo4H
A2u06cuxUxK487FOu28C4us=
=BVXq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mCdhXfk5CmamXiy1--

--===============1201713090==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
platform mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform

--===============1201713090==--