Re: Xorg version number change

Roland Mainz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >  > > This change doesn't look right.  The 6.8.1 release is on the
> > >  > > XORG-6_8-branch, and that's where 6.8.2 will come from.  HEAD is going
> > >  > > to be 6.9.0 or 7.0 or whatever gets decided.
> > >  >         ^^^^^    ^^^
> > >  >
> > >  > Please NO. Please simply stop this version number inflation. Even for
> > >  > the last release it wasn't really justified to bump the version number
> > >  > to 6.8 where 6.7.1 was sufficient (AFAIK the only argument was the
> > >  > introduction of the "Composite", "DAMAGE" etc. extensions).
> > >  > IMO the next major release should be named X11R6.8.2 unless something
> > >  > really really big changes (and if I recall it correctly X11R7 is
> > >  > reserved for the autotooled tree right now).
> > >
> > > It has been argeed upon that the x.x.y rleases with y > 1 are bugfix
> > > and security update releases for the x.x.0 releases. That decisison
> > > has been reflected in the branch sceme of the tree.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable. Hopefully noone complains when X11R6.10.0 gets
> > released (which alphabetically sorts lower than "X11R6.9.0"... :) ...
> > =:-)
> 
> ... so don't use alphabetic sort when things like this matters.

Filesystems (and therefore ftp servers) and most package search engines
use alphabetical search order by default.

> > > We need to be able to 'mark' a bugfix release to distinguish it from
> > > the release it was based on. That was what the third number was
> > > added for. It hasn't existed in the X.Org numbering sceme so far if
> > > I recall correctly.
> >
> > Wasn't there a X11R6.5.1 release (and my Solaris/CDE desktop claims
> > (=output of sdtwsinfo) to be based on X11R6.4.1) ?
> 
> Back in 1994? :)

No, back in 2004. Sun's X11 tree for Solaris 8 is AFAIK (Alan may
correct me :) a heavily modified X11R6.4 version where the emphasis lies
on __HEAVY__ (for example the whole Xprint code is far far newer,
partially even beyond Xorg trunk. And then it has all-new Xinerama code,
threading fixes etc. etc.). It's origin is still X11R6.4 and that's what
sdtwsinfo reports here...

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.