Re: X11R6.8.2 maintenance release plans and call for comments.
Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 20:20, Ian Romanick wrote: > What should be done about things like the endianess issues in the > t_vertex code in the r128 and r200 drivers? I committed fixes to Mesa > CVS (trunk). I'd really like to see those fixes committed. Without > them, those drivers really suck on big-endian systems. :) I suspect > that radeon driver has the same problems, but I don't have any PowerPC > R100 cards to test. > > If none of these bugs had fixes already in CVS, I'd suggests that a bug > be filed for all of them (i.e., "Big-endian problems with t_vertex > drivers") and that depend on a bug for each of the individual drivers. > Is that still the right answer? For Mesa (anything in extras/ really) I think we're justified in just saying "Bug #XXX: Import current Mesa stable branch for 6.8.2" and then documenting the changes from the commit messages for the stable branch. - ajax _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBfvRCW4otUKDs0NMRAmINAJ93HEPLkfZG9zgfoN0tUfKUvNtjHACfd1NK I6u8g6B6AbyurwEZFPqPJOg= =wlrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----