Re: approval_X11R6.8.x requested: [Bug 1843] Link stage oflibOSMesa.so.4.0 fails every couple of months with "too manysymbols require `small' PIC references" : [Attachment 1301]Patch for 2004-11-12-trunk

Roland Mainz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 10:17:07AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:51:12PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > Requesting approval for X11R6.8.x-branch.
> > > >
> > > > I know that the nomination period for normal patches is over but this issue
> > > > permanently harasses the developers - it's having a habit of lying low, like a
> > > > rake in the grass and waiting there to hit you at moments when you really don't
> > > > expect it. I'd like to see this bug dead dead dead... :)
> > >
> > > Ouch, read it as the 17th originally.  I haven't yet had time to
> > > nominate patches (our 6.8.1 packages just got released earlier this
> > > week), and I've been stuck on other tasks for the rest of the week.
> > > Would you mind if I filed and nominated until the 16th?
> >
> > I am not done yet with making triage comments for the remaining patches
> > in the approval queue (yes, I know, I am too slow... ;-( ), I am still
> > hoping to see the one or other approval request by Egbert Eich (like for
> > the gb18030 stuff :) and maybe the DragonFly people may come up with a
> > final patch for their platform, too. So you're not alone with being late
> > - and it's weekend anyway :)
> 
> Cool, thanks. :)

Please don't forget that the patches should be in Xorg "trunk" before
requesting approval for the X11R6.8.x-branch...

> > No objections from my side (it would be nice if you can complete your
> > approval requests at the end of sunday if possible :)
> 
> Mmm.  Unfortunately I answer to a higher order than work or X.Org, so I
> have been instructed (under penalty of death, or worse than, for
> non-compliance) to go seek photos of Copenhagen while I'm visiting
> today, and then I fly to London tomorrow.

... which reminds me that if my "higher order" figures out that I didn't
slept for more than a day than she's going to do something worse than
death, too... ;-/

> But the hotel in London has
> free internet access, so I should get it sorted tonight/tomorrow mostly,
> with some overflow into Monday.

Well, I said "... it would be nice...", I didn't said anything like
"mandatory"/"must"/etc. ... :) The only problem with that is that the
triaging/discussion of patches should be moved to this list if possible
since it took one hour of fridays's phone call to crawl throught half
the list. Monday's release-wranglers call should be done in less time if
possible (otherwise my phone bill is likely going to ruin me, I already
live in fear of the bill of nov ... ;-() ... and somehow that's slightly
problematic if a large amount of patches gets it's approval request
10mins before the monday call is made.

> The other thing I'd like to throw up is benh's upcoming PowerPC patch,
> which IMHO is really, really, really important.

... that one then may fall under the category "important/critical
patches" ... :)

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.