Re: [Bug 1896] libX11 support for pt_BR

Felix Schulte wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:13 +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > Erm... which patches are that (except those from Daniel Stone - which
> > > seems to miss more or less all requirements needed to obtain approval
> > > for X1R6.8.x (and yes, I am ANGRY about this misuse of the approval flag
> > > system)) - could you please make a list ? Until now I thought all
> > > patches which are approved for X11R6.8.x are commited to "trunk", too
> > > (this applies AFAIK to all of my patches and most of the patches I can
> > > think about).
> >
> > There's now 19 bugs with 30 attachments pending review and commit and
> > whatever without any flags at all, and I strongly suggest their
> > inclusion in 6.8.x.
> >
> > I'm not doing anything with them or filing further bugs because it makes
> > you angry.  Tell me how to work without making you angry and I'll do
> > what I can to get them in and included in a way that doesn't kill you.
> Daniel, could you please stop acting like a troll?

Could you please stop naming Daniel a "troll" ? It seems he just didn't
understand the approval flag system - which is understandable for most
people who didn't work at mozilla.org some time...

> The approval process for the new release is very clear:
> 1. You make a patch
> 2. You get it reviewed on demand
> 3. You commit it to HEAD
> 4. You request approval for the release branch

Nice list (if you don't mind I'll put that into the X11R6.8.2 release
page) ... :)

Actually there should be some time between [3] and [4] unless the patch
is a trivial one (typo fix) or has at least something like "...blessing
by the module owner..." or something like that...

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)