Re: Re: Notes from the 2004-12-03 release-wranglers call...

Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2004 19:49, Roland Mainz wrote:
> 
>>2. The schedule:
>>-  8 Dec 2004: The normal patch nomination phase ends
>>- 13 Dec 2004: Final patch approval - the remaining patches are getting
>>either approved or rejected in the release-wranglers phone call
>>- 15 Dec 2004: Final date when all approved patches must be checked in.
>>After that the Release Canidate 1 will be tagged and source tarballs be
>>created. More release canidates will follow based on the results of the
>>testing phase
> 
> 
> I've apparently volunteered to merge Mesa 6.2 for this release.  However, I'll 
> be out of town this week until roughly 8pm EST on the 11th.  This makes the 
> schedule a little tight.  Assuming everyone wants 6.2 in 6.8.2 - and this 
> seems to be the consensus - I'd like to ask Roland's permission to nominate 
> the patch on the 11th.  (The alternative would be for someone else to take 
> care of the merge and patch generation, and I certainly wouldn't object.)
> 
> Mesa folks, if there's any bugfixes in HEAD that should be applied to the 6.2 
> branch, this should happen soon.  I'd suggest a 6.2.1 tag once any further 
> fixes are in, and then I'd merge that.

Every bug fix I put into the trunk I also put in the 6.2 branch.  The 
DRI drivers are another story.  It looks like few, if any, DRI driver 
fixes/changes have been checked into the 6.2 branch.

I'd like to move some of my recent changes from the trunk which 
silence compiler warnings into the 6.2 branch.  I recently upgraded to 
gcc 3.4.2 - it seems a bit more pickier.

-Brian


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/