Re: Tinderbox status.

It is easy, from the server side, to specify whether head, or some
branch should be built.  Switching from one branch to the other is a 5
minute task by the tinderbox administrator, and kicking the machines to
restart builds.

And it is easy to have more than one tinderbox (if we can get enough
build machines), so that more than one branch might be continually
built.

Right now, it would probably be best until .2 goes out the door to
switch over to the release branch from head.
				- Jim


On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 09:09 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The tinderbox is already up.  I've put it on one of my machines to
> > reduce the number of odd services that fd.o has to run in its webserver.
> > 
> > http://tinderbox.anholt.net/
> 
> The specific interest from yesterdays call was getting people running it
> on the monolithic 6.8.2 branch of CVS  - does that need to be set up as a
> separate project page in the tinderbox?  (I assume the current tinderbox
> XMonolithic project pulls from CVS head.)
>