Re: Call Monday 24 Jan 2005

Adam Jackson wrote:
> 
> On Monday 24 January 2005 02:18, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > > - Discussion about Daniel Stones recent behaviour (a seperate Xorg
> > > > board call may be neccesary to decide what should be done here)
> > >
> > > Er, I can see how this would be appropriate for a general X.Org call, but
> > > surely the purpose of r-w calls is 6.8.x, which my commits were unrelated
> > > to?
> >
> > As I said, a seperate Xorg directors call may now be required as you are
> > refusing even minimum cooperation (it's not about the recent comit
> > itself, more about the general behaviour...).
> 
> Are you seriously suggesting disciplinary action for a change that appears to
> have majority community support and that we have no established policy for
> doing any other way?

It's the way how Daniel is acting now and in the past. It's not only
todays incident (where Daniel has horked the default settings for _ALL_
operating systems and not only Linux) - things like his attacks against
Kaleb Keithley and Julien Lafon, randomly closing bugzilla bugs (like
the request from SuSE staff to update the xterm version in the
monolithic tree), uploading patches with offensive comments (while
"wondering" why people act quite upset when they find these comments),
ignoring review comments in bugs even after two people asked for
adjustments, filing extra bugzilla bugs with comments just to harass the
people (like the "... lets upload OpenSSH, VNC etc. into Xorg CVS,
too..." - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363), and
various other "accidents" resulted in the need of such a seperate call.

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)