Re: Call Monday 24 Jan 2005

On Monday 24 January 2005 11:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Are you seriously suggesting disciplinary action for a change that
> > appears to have majority community support and that we have no
> > established policy for doing any other way?
>
> I don't know about what action should be taken, but I don't believe there
> is any sort of consensus or majority support for dismantling the monolithic
> tree, unless and until a plan is in place to get a working modular release
> going.   Destroying what we have without a replacement is just foolish.

Huzzah, the real issue identified.  Can we please make this plan _exist_?  I'm 
tired of sitting in this netherworld where m12n is perpetually put off by 
doomsaying.

As noted elsewhere, nothing is destroyed by this change.

- ajax

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBB9S4UW4otUKDs0NMRAkztAJ9gyG8IItngoZ6vhRNfbObsQ648bwCffSoG
zdYkkFPCck96gxNjb/gJOjg=
=oKo0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----