Re: Call Monday 24 Jan 2005

Adam Jackson wrote:
> 
> On Monday 24 January 2005 11:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > Are you seriously suggesting disciplinary action for a change that
> > > appears to have majority community support and that we have no
> > > established policy for doing any other way?
> >
> > I don't know about what action should be taken, but I don't believe there
> > is any sort of consensus or majority support for dismantling the monolithic
> > tree, unless and until a plan is in place to get a working modular release
> > going.   Destroying what we have without a replacement is just foolish.
> 
> Huzzah, the real issue identified.  Can we please make this plan _exist_?  I'm
> tired of sitting in this netherworld where m12n is perpetually put off by
> doomsaying.

Well, I hope the Xorg conference in february will bring some light into
the issue... :)

> As noted elsewhere, nothing is destroyed by this change.

... just the default build config is horked right now.

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)