Re: Call Monday 24 Jan 2005
Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/[email protected]> Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:01:17 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:55:20AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > That patch was the original idea from my old employer to have it in > Mozilla, however the patch never really worked (outside Solaris) and to > get it working it would have required to import lots of X11 sources into > the Mozilla tree. Additionally Mozilla.org didn't like the license (the > plugin source is MIT/X.org, Mozilla wants MPL or MPL+GPL or MPL+LGPL). Er, so if it cannot work without published X headers, how will it go in a modular X world? > And then it turned out that NS4.x+Konqueror wouldn't be covered by such > a patch and the whole idea of a Mozilla integration was dropped in favor > of an internal X11 codeline (shipping the plugin with the commercial > products which use it). In the meantime I switched jobs and CERN staff > independently (e.g. I wasn't involved in that work) developed a similar > patch for their environment. And around three years later then the issue > hit the new X.org bugzilla > (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=950 being AFAIK the first > one, however I was ignoring that after forwaring the issue to the CERN > people (who failed to donate any of their patches to the (old) X.org > Consortium and did't had much faith that anything will move). After the > second bugzilla bug was filed I looked at it and simply fixed the issue > (which means the new patch in the X.org tree is a cleanroom > implementation as the old patch in the mozilla.org bugzilla was written > for my old employer) for now (that's why I said "... I am slightly > familar with that code..."... I worked already on that long long ago so > the whole stuff wasn't a total mystery for me :) until CERN moves their > patches into the X.org (Foundation) tree. Ah, OK. Thanks for the explanation. I'm still unclear on why integrating it into the Mozilla tree as a concept (or simply just a small external project) isn't better, however -- I'm not quite convinced of its worth any more than I am of VNC viewers, for example. > > Have you fixed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=950 yet? > > That was fixed with the newer patch. The new plugin works with Mozilla, > Konqueror and Netscape 4.x. Good to hear. _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB9yQdRkzMgPKxYGwRAm3kAJsGgBriJwqha3DwTxZB93zOPXaAFgCgigs6 +pgr2jmdrcZPYXdQfgkeN4c= =sb9h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----