Re: Call Monday 24 Jan 2005

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roland Mainz wrote:
| No, Daniel has finally going too far this time. And I am not the only
| one who thinks that some action is now required after he blew up the
| tree _INTENTIONALLY_ (see my comment about
| https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 above).

Where did he "blow up the tree"? He disabled some stuff from building
_by default_ that either (1) the vast majority of people don't use or
(2) X isn't upstream for, while it pretends to be.

The build isn't broken, which blowing up the tree implies, and the
changes certainly aren't reversible by users who want something
different. They're defaults, which are easily changed.

Some things seem to be getting blown out of proportion here.

Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB90IjXVaO67S1rtsRAo20AKDFPN5Y1d+lAIpuxrjx7CvMqhJRHwCZAasC
NuVkRi6FrkTZd6cPF9Ry51o=
=P8aH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----