Re: Bootstrapping X.Org (was Call Monday 24 Jan 2005)

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Would the top-level Makefile thing, or jhbuild, satisfy your concern here?
> 
> Using jhbuild does not satisfy my concerns which are to make sure that 
> the X.Org tree can be distibuted under a MIT/BSD-style license, and that 
> X can be built and distibuted as part of the base installation of OpenBSD.
> 
> Jhbuild is depending on python, which is not part of the base OpenBSD 
> system and has a license that can become a problem for people who want 
> to binaries.

My understanding of the *BSD ports was that you guys had Makefiles
which controlled the building of each specific module, so surely you
could use those, no?  I was suggesting jhbuild as a convenience for
end users.

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB/DLcRkzMgPKxYGwRAuPtAJ9GaNSXh4Cci1FD3/+6XtQEJgIkhwCdHC+v
RkD+ehQV5XXyNm9NGh6tUoc=
=F10G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----