Re: Bootstrapping X.Org (was Call Monday 24 Jan 2005)
Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:13:42 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote: > Daniel Stone writes: > > My understanding of the *BSD ports was that you guys had Makefiles > > which controlled the building of each specific module, so surely you > > could use those, no? I was suggesting jhbuild as a convenience for > > end users. > > Wouldn't it make sense for us to distribute such Makefiles for > certain build situations also? > To me it looks like there whould be a lot of other groups who > have the same concern (no Python available) besides the BSDs and > would thus benefit from such Makefiles. Sure, but my understanding of most of these operating systems is that the packagers make ports and other general packages. I can see the utility of a top-level Makefile and am not disputing it, but I just don't think it will be quite that widely-used. _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB/hLmRkzMgPKxYGwRAgTdAJ9mjB8W+mrGK+6FrCKulCoZkzYYjgCfVw1P +oULbFFpCVFwfOy6pzSURhA= =/REk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----