Re: Bootstrapping X.Org (was Call Monday 24 Jan 2005)

Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:13:42 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Daniel Stone writes:
>  > My understanding of the *BSD ports was that you guys had Makefiles
>  > which controlled the building of each specific module, so surely you
>  > could use those, no?  I was suggesting jhbuild as a convenience for
>  > end users.
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense for us to distribute such Makefiles for 
> certain build situations also? 
> To me it looks like there whould be a lot of other groups who 
> have the same concern (no Python available) besides the BSDs and
> would thus benefit from such Makefiles.

Sure, but my understanding of most of these operating systems is that
the packagers make ports and other general packages.  I can see the
utility of a top-level Makefile and am not disputing it, but I just
don't think it will be quite that widely-used.

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB/hLmRkzMgPKxYGwRAgTdAJ9mjB8W+mrGK+6FrCKulCoZkzYYjgCfVw1P
+oULbFFpCVFwfOy6pzSURhA=
=/REk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----