Re: [xkb] Re: new layout

Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:35:22 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Would you like to start checking the changes into the Xorg monolothic
tree yourself then?   If you're willing to do the work of sync'ing it
up with your xkeyboard-config tree, I'm sure we could work that out
without much trouble.

As far as I know the only reason no one is updating the Xorg xkb data
files is because no one has volunteered to take that on.

	-Alan Coopersmith-           [email protected]
	 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> I absolutely agree - and that is the question I asked Mike Harris
> (Fedora's X maintainer) today:
> 
> <mharris> It appears the files included in Xorg itself never get
> bugfixed/updated.
> <svu_> mharris, exactly! Noone cares about layouts in the big xorg tree
> - the bugs are just hanging around...
> <mharris> svu_: We've got a pretty full plate of issues right now, but
> if the list shrinks in the next 2 weeks significantly, I can bring it up
> on our weekly confcalls for discussion.
> <mharris> Or should I say...
> <mharris> I can bring the motion to the table for feasibility
> determination.
> 
> I am really unhappy with the situation we have now - bugs are fixed but
> end-users do not have any benefits from this... Unfortunately all I can
> do is to chase xorg people asking same questions again and again...
> 
> Sergey
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 01:13 +0100, Danilo Segan wrote:
> 
>>Today at 0:35, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Well, as I keep telling, xkeyboard-config will not be used in the
>>>monolythic tree (well, some distributions may decide differently). It is
>>>intented for the modular xorg release, speaking of which I cite a couple
>>>of lines from IRC:
>>
>>I wonder for purely practical and lazyness reasons: I have so far
>>submitted any fixes I had only to xkeyboard-config repository (now, it
>>would be a mess to send basically same, but still slightly different
>>fixes to 3 different places).  But, distributions seem to ship with
>>older, unfixed sets of layouts.
>>
>>And that is *bad*.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Danilo
>>
>>#############################################################
>>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>>  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
>>To subscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> or <[email protected]>
>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
>>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
>>Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>
>>
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list <[email protected]>.
> To subscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> or <[email protected]>
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
> Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>
>