Re: libprinter.a .99 error ...?

On Monday 11 July 2005 17:01, Felix Schulte wrote:
> On 7/11/05, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The xlib source is not available at link time in the modular tree.
> >
> > Nor should it be.
>
> Does this make sense? Duplicating the source code is IMO a bad idea
> and linking libX11 against a Xserver which does not need it is even
> worse.

Yes, it makes sense.  Yes, those are both bad ideas.  They reflect the poor 
design decision to use client-side code in a server, so now we have to make 
unpleasant choices.  Life is hard.

We are not going to require a copy of the Xlib source to build the server.  
The source that gets symlinked across has to get cloned, this is a direct 
result of modularisation.  The only issue is whether they can be cloned 
without needing to link Xprt against Xlib as well.  Alan seems to know how to 
prevent this link.

- ajax

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
release-wranglers-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBC0ul9W4otUKDs0NMRAptPAKDBmSU/gqtE1D+NMc9eQB4NKUmG1wCeOAN0
BmBb7ZxSJNhFK4IQQitvJz8=
=SnzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----