Re: libprinter.a .99 error ...?
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:56:56 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg,gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.modular |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 11 July 2005 18:49, Felix Schulte wrote: > On 7/11/05, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it makes sense. Yes, those are both bad ideas. They reflect the > > poor design decision to use client-side code in a server, so now we have > > to make unpleasant choices. Life is hard. > > IMO this issue puts a big question mark behind the modularisation > project. Parts of the xc tree uses shared source code and neither > source code duplication or addition of new dependencies are proper > solutions for the modular tree. If you have a better solution I am eager to hear it, bearing in mind that "not doing modularisation" is not an option, and neither is a build-time source dependency on libX11. - ajax _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBC0vk/W4otUKDs0NMRAgcYAKDge6GwJj7+O6/Qjeax9lFJq8HB1QCeNpwj WxUsC8cbrl5eCYTTaNJ8J3U= =PN/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----