Re: So what next?

Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Keith Packard writes:
>  > I believe we will not have concensus on this issue anytime soon and that we
>  > need a formal conflict resolution process here.
>  > 
>  > I'm feel strongly that now is the best time to make the migration to a
>  > modular build system, and that separating the build system transition from
>  > any technical changes will give people the greatest confidence in the new
>  > system.  Doing that transition at the same time we add a bunch of new code
>  > will be very hard on everyone.
> 
> I'm not so sure about this. I'm not even sure if there is a consensus
> how the build system will look like. Some people have proposed a new
> build system. 

I think that the general consensus among proponents of the modular tree
is to use the build system currently embodied by xlibs/xserver/xapps.

> Speaking of myself I have issues with this build system. Contrary to
> what has been promised I have *not* received a satisfactory answer to
> my questions.
> The following answers do *not* qualify as satisfactory:
> 1. "Some people may loose but think of the benefit for the others."
> 2. "I don't know off hand how to do this we should take a closer
>    look at the documentation."
> 3. "I'm sure it can be done but I don't know off hand how."

If you can restate your questions, I can try to find some definitive
answers. I think a lot of it got lost in invective and hand-waving in
the original threads.

:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel-rLtY4a/[email protected]>
"The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_,
available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAe6s6cPClnTztfv0RAuSmAJ9vMGjfDHdOh5Uv4tUqwtScUWZRVgCfcLm7
Xb7l+Qrf4jRO0J5AA4IsgGE=
=cPAD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.