Re: So what next?
Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > Keith Packard writes: > > I believe we will not have concensus on this issue anytime soon and that we > > need a formal conflict resolution process here. > > > > I'm feel strongly that now is the best time to make the migration to a > > modular build system, and that separating the build system transition from > > any technical changes will give people the greatest confidence in the new > > system. Doing that transition at the same time we add a bunch of new code > > will be very hard on everyone. > > I'm not so sure about this. I'm not even sure if there is a consensus > how the build system will look like. Some people have proposed a new > build system. I think that the general consensus among proponents of the modular tree is to use the build system currently embodied by xlibs/xserver/xapps. > Speaking of myself I have issues with this build system. Contrary to > what has been promised I have *not* received a satisfactory answer to > my questions. > The following answers do *not* qualify as satisfactory: > 1. "Some people may loose but think of the benefit for the others." > 2. "I don't know off hand how to do this we should take a closer > look at the documentation." > 3. "I'm sure it can be done but I don't know off hand how." If you can restate your questions, I can try to find some definitive answers. I think a lot of it got lost in invective and hand-waving in the original threads. :) d -- Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/[email protected]> "The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_, available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAe6s6cPClnTztfv0RAuSmAJ9vMGjfDHdOh5Uv4tUqwtScUWZRVgCfcLm7 Xb7l+Qrf4jRO0J5AA4IsgGE= =cPAD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----