Re: [Xorg] RELEASE-1 merged into CURRENT
Keith Packard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Around 12 o'clock on Apr 15, Egbert Eich wrote: > I've just got done merging the RELEASE-1 branch into CURRENT. Thanks, Egbert. > 1. I had the usual spurious conflicts from cvs IDs. Keeping XdotOrg: > and XFree86: IDs in close vicinity is like calling for trouble. We might want to change the XFree86 lines from actual CVS tags to something that CVS won't parse but which still retains the XFree86 version information: /* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/dix/main.c,v 3.43 2003/10/30 21:21:02 herrb Exp $ */ would become: /* Derived from XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/dix/main.c,v 3.43 2003/10/30 21:21:02 herrb Exp $ */ Getting back to the original CVS tag would be trivial if necessary and we would avoid CVS accidentally rewriting the tag and losing this information. > 3. I've used the new ChangeLog file format Keith has been proposing. > (I've removed the long list of files, instead I've added the > ChangeLog from the RELEASE-1 branch (indented by 1). > If you agree on this format we need to document how to create > changelog files and I will convert the previous changelog entries > to the new format (once I've figured out how to do this without > too much hassle). There is a perl script (prepare-ChangeLog.pl) available in /home/local/bin which will walk the tree and generate a template in ChangeLog that includes the files and functions modified, along with the appropriate header line. However, this tool traverses the entire repository, making it unsuitable for use in the monolithic tree as it just takes too long. We might modify this script to take an optional list of sub-hierarchies to examine for changes. The main benefit of this alternate format is that changes are tagged by date instead of a number. This makes it possible to prepare changes on branches and merge them into the release without needing to hand-merge the change log entries and resequence them. > 4. I will investigate how to merge the CURRENT branch into HEAD > without causing too much headache for others. I don't think this will cause much trouble; no-one is using HEAD at the moment. Merge at will! -keith _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001 iD8DBQFAfrdjQp8BWwlsTdMRAsO2AKCuslfKJruAYzybFLWlGGQgyhkVfwCggBc8 KjMpEh2rkH6CudgD8VX3vfY= =4VNK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----