Re: X.Org Foundation release plan [draft]
Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1089992978.899.25.camel@leguin> |
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 08:30, Stuart Kreitman wrote: > Kevin: > > I believe you should enter: > > Stuart Kreitman: > - integration of Composite to DAMAGE-XFIXES branch > - update XEVIE to 1.1 > - update of D-X branch to head and finally into head I don't see any need to update D-X branch to head. I don't expect that there would be any conflicts with merging it from the branch as-is, or I can merge it from one of my composite integration trees. > Kevin E Martin wrote: > > >Here is the first draft of the X.Org Foundation release plan. I would > >like to discuss it during the release wrangler's call today. I've also > > > > > > > >Eric Anholt: > >- Damage/fixes are ready to go > >- Composite in xorg top of TODO list > > > --- By this I suppose you are referring to the XAA integration with > Composite? Otherwise, I and a few others at Sun have a lot of > work already invested in composite on the xorg pool. I mean writing a generic wrapper for Composite that doesn't require any knowledge of Composite by the DDX, which is needed for nvidia support. I understand Sun had already done this work, but getting that from them was turning out to be hard from what I understand, so I'm implementing it myself. I think I'm almost there. -- Eric Anholt [email protected] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [email protected]