Re: "Composite" and multiple screens / was: Re: Minutes from July 16 Release Wranglers call

Keith Packard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Around 2 o'clock on Jul 18, Roland Mainz wrote:

> What will happen if there are multiple screens where one screen supports
> "Composite" and the other doesn't (I am thinking here about the
> "traditional" multihead (multiple seperate screens), Xinerama, DMX and
> SLS...) ?

I hadn't worried about this case; the only case it can currently occur is
in DMX as all of the existing monolithic servers should support composite
quite nicely on all screens with the GC/Picture wrapping code which makes
Composite a purely DIX/MI level extension (just like the MI backing store
or MI software cursor code).

Composite doesn't have requests to discover which screens it is supported 
on, and I don't think it's reasonable to add one, rather an X server 
should either support it on all screens or not at all, so in the DMX case, 
I would expect the multiplexor to hide the existance of Composite unless 
supported on all subservient X servers.

-keith

_______________________________________________
release-wranglers mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001

iD8DBQFA+cdqQp8BWwlsTdMRArYGAKCHkck36TdbEqSwnycNgITagQhWvACg4ev+
hA94WmLIMKt97ad4BeHmlNg=
=PW9p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.