Re: "Composite" and multiple screens / was: Re: Minutes from July 16 Release Wranglers call
Keith Packard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Around 2 o'clock on Jul 18, Roland Mainz wrote: > What will happen if there are multiple screens where one screen supports > "Composite" and the other doesn't (I am thinking here about the > "traditional" multihead (multiple seperate screens), Xinerama, DMX and > SLS...) ? I hadn't worried about this case; the only case it can currently occur is in DMX as all of the existing monolithic servers should support composite quite nicely on all screens with the GC/Picture wrapping code which makes Composite a purely DIX/MI level extension (just like the MI backing store or MI software cursor code). Composite doesn't have requests to discover which screens it is supported on, and I don't think it's reasonable to add one, rather an X server should either support it on all screens or not at all, so in the DMX case, I would expect the multiplexor to hide the existance of Composite unless supported on all subservient X servers. -keith _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001 iD8DBQFA+cdqQp8BWwlsTdMRArYGAKCHkck36TdbEqSwnycNgITagQhWvACg4ev+ hA94WmLIMKt97ad4BeHmlNg= =PW9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----