Re: [Xorg] Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sun Microsystems |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm not sure I want to claim any ownership or responsibility for the hw/sun tree. The only cards listed in the README that I even know where to find are the cg6 series, and those have a directory under hw/xfree86/drivers already. Sun/4 is definitely the only hardware platform listed there we still have, none of the Sun/2, Sun/3 or Sun386i hardware. Unless someone wants to step up and volunteer, I can't see continuing to support it. Since we're so close to the 6.8 release, I think the best solution for that is to release note the lack of support and change the default for Solaris/SPARC builds to build Xorg instead of Xsun (a one-line change to the svr4.cf file). -alan- Stuart Anderson wrote: > I didn't mean to imply that we can't get rid of orphaned code, just that > since the "owner" of this code is present, and participating, it should > be their call as to what happens to it. If it stays, then it should be > maintained in the same manner as everything else that stays. > > Changes to common code requires concensus. Vendor specific code, > however, should probably be the responsibility of that vendor. > > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > >>Stuart Anderson wrote: >> >>>I think it is up to the vendors that provided these DDX to decide what >>>their status is (ie it's your call). Fix it, turn it off, or rip it out. >>>Like Mike said, if it stays in, it should get a tinderbox to prove it at >>>least builds ok. There should be a row for it in the Release Readiness Table >>>if you want it. >>> >> >>Hmm. I'd prefer to see that differently - the presumption should be that the >>code should be ripped out unless somebody steps up and (a) protests and (b) is >>seen to demonstrate willingness to maintain the code. I don't see any value >>in keeping broken code in the tree otherwise. If someone wants it back in the >>future, it will still be in the repository (just not visible on the head). >> >>Otherwise, we're all tiptoe-ing around trying not to offend people who >>probably don't exist & if they do are much more interested in other stuff. >> >>Keith >> > > > > Stuart > > Stuart R. Anderson anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected] > Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/ > 1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F > BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149 -- -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering