Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Keith Packard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Around 9 o'clock on Aug 23, Stuart Kreitman wrote: > I have posted this question internally to see if we have a language > lawyer who can explain whether there's some > standards body intent to push one form or another. Its not my bag. I've always understood the types to be uint32_t et alia. -keith _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001 iD8DBQFBKiFtQp8BWwlsTdMRAg5+AJsEvt5gt8C/IqWGf+67k+NoLwVNBwCgwcy3 VCTrd1eKP9osibVMepWgwvE= =GZeA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----