Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t

Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> 
> 
>>Just some thoughts that might be useful..
> 
> 
> You described exactly what we had in mind when we came up with the
> test matrix.

Great.  ;o)  Is one to then assume that if nobody tests the platforms in 
the test matrix, that they end up not being "officially" 100% supported?

I'm guessing some of the untested ones will become tested this week, and 
others will fall into "we hope it works, if not send patches" category, 
or fall off the face of the earth.  ;)