Re: Xmd.h in c99 form

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:

>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:03:34 +1100
>From: Daniel Stone <[email protected]>
>To: Mike A. Harris <[email protected]>
>Cc: xlibs-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+"
>Subject: Re: [Xlibs] Xmd.h in c99 form
>
>On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:24:35AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>> Just curious about this change, and why it resulted in version 
>> bump?  Seems like a small enough change to not warrant a new 
>> release, but I'm curious about what I might be missing.  ;o)
>
>*shrug*, I just didn't want to put something out there that would result
>in there being two Xrender 0.8.3's.

But there are ;o)

-- 
Mike A. Harris