Re: libXt, libXmu, libXaw, libXtst, libdps
Harold L Hunt II <huntharo-mhe/[email protected]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:58:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xlibs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeremy, I didn't have a chance to look at these yet, but Xt, Xaw, and Xmu are essential for me to get Cygwin/X built and distributed from the new xlibs and xserver trees. I appreciate very much the work that you have done here, or else I would have to do it myself. Unfortunately, with all of the exams going on (among other things), I won't have a chance to review your code for at least a week or two. Hopefully someone else can review your code, or, if Keith or Jim approves, just commit it and deal with problems if any arise. Harold Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I didn't get any response two weeks to my auto-tool'ed libXt that I > provided. My emails and questions I had about it are in the archive I > assume. > http://www.reedmedia.net/misc/X/libXt-6.0-jcr3.tar.bz2 > > I want to now make libXmu, libXaw, libXtst and libdps. But I'd rather not > if someone else is doing it or if it is a wasted (will not be used) > effort. > > Please let me know. > > Also, should I even consider autotooling XFree86 libXaw when there are > other alternatives such as the following? > http://www.zip.com.au/~bb/XawXpm/ > Xaw3d from X11 contrib mirrors > http://siag.nu/neXtaw/ > and maybe others > > By the way, I am using your xlibs to slowly build up a pkgsrc (from > NetBSD) system. For example, I can now build and use The Gimp and > Ghostscript's gs using your xlibs. I believe the plan for pkgsrc (which > works ove various operating systems) is to make it an option other than > XFree86.) Thank you! > > Jeremy C. Reed > http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Xlibs mailing list > Xlibs-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected] > http://pdx.freedesktop.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xlibs