Re: The X11R6.7 DDX New World Order

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 07:16:37PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> Lets say xizzle would work amazgly with the old DDX and the stuff
> how would that contribute anything to xserver?
> wouldn't it make more sense to try to move Xorg to the new dix or ddx or
> whichever one?:)

Xizzle *is* the old DDX. What I did was take Xizzle's build
infrastructure (the Makefile.am's and configure.ac stuff, mainly), and
dump the X11R6.7 *code* on top of this.

Basically eliminating all the misguided code changes I did; all the
changes are basically in modularDefs.h, or documented in
hw/xorg/CHANGES.

Xorg has been moved to the new DIX - that's what hw/xorg is.
Unfortunately, because Xorg and KDrive need different things from the
DIX, they can't use the same *build* of a DIX - you can't build both at
the same time - but that's the only limitation.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                            <[email protected]>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop                http://www.freedesktop.org

_______________________________________________
xserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xserver

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAi+i0cPClnTztfv0RAt0qAJ9Uy6e6d9CmwODF9ducbqbunS7aLgCfVkOF
8XQw7uX+7pHniFbVkDXEFmg=
=XcS4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----