Re: First review of ATI420 chip
Alex Deucher <agd5f-/[email protected]> Tue, 4 May 2004 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Sean Middleditch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 14:42, Jon Smirl wrote: > > http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.cfm?articleid=517&cid=2 > > > > This picture makes a good case for why xserver should move away > from using the > > 2D hardware to the 3D versions. > > It will be interesting in the future if we see card architectures > like > the below, but missing that little "2D Engine" block. ;-) > > I wonder how well things like video acceleration can mix with the 3D > engine? And also, is it feasible to get something like the Linux I wonder if this card even has a video overlay or if they jsut relay on YUV textures for doing accelerated video. I wonder if it's worth trying to create a server module for Xv that interfaces with the dri_driver, similar to what we are looking at for indirect rendering, or if it's better to convince video app programmers to use openGL. Alex __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover