Re: [Xorg] Reorganizing the xc/include directory
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> Mon, 17 May 2004 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If you used bitkeeper you could do the branch with history without doing any special commands. You could sync it to the trunk every day automatically unless there is a merge conflict. It would track file renames in the history and do merges that track the file renames. Plus bkbits provides a transparent bridge to CVS for people that stick with it. Just my occasional plug for bitkeeper. After using it on the kernel I have concluded that it is way better than CVS. Just my opinion, I have nothing to do with the company. --- Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Around 16 o'clock on May 17, Egbert Eich wrote: > > > Shall we start a branch on CVS so we can work on this together? > > I'd be willing to help on this. > > Sure. Got any idea what name we should use? modular_include? > > We won't be able to use regular CVS commands to actually move the files as > I'd like to preserve CVS history for them. > > I suggest that we copy the ,v files into the new location in the > repository. We can then cvs rm the existing files so that old branches > will still build (but will end up with copies of the files in both places). > > -keith > > > > ATTACHMENT part 1.2 application/pgp-signature > _______________________________________________ > xserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xserver > ===== Jon Smirl jonsmirl-/[email protected] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/