Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients
Ian Romanick <[email protected]> Mon, 24 May 2004 12:15:01 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andy Ritger wrote: > The other concern (how to make sure direct rendering has completed > by the time the drawable is used as a source in a composite > operation) conceptually would be solved as you describe, but I > expect the implementation would be buried deeper I guess I don't see what the problem is. The graphics device processes commands as a FIFO. Groups of direct rendering commands are surrounded by a lock. If the compositor uses the same lock, synchronization and proper ordering are guaranteed. Determining if direct rendering has damaged a region is another kettle of fish, though... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click --