Re: pbuffers, extensions to DRM
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 23:24, Jon Smirl wrote: > 3) FB memory allocators. Not sure these should go into the DRM system. It might > be better to put this into the library with init/mode support. Mesa would need > to be modified to use these allocation routines. On the other hand these might > be better inside the DRM driver. Future hardware may not allow direct access to > the framebuffer. I think at least the core of it definitely has to be in the kernel for enforceability, cleanup on process death etc. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click