Re: New DRM model
Nicolas Souchu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:32:52PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote: > --- Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 07:01, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > I have a new version of DRM at bk://mesa3d.bkbits.net/drm > > > In it's current form it's 2.6 kernel only. Some support is generic but I've > > > mainly be working on an R200. It is still under development with lots of > > work to > > > do. > > > > Nice, but I still need a equivalent of radeonfb for mode setting, which > > has to be in the kernel. And fbcon should survive for a while, at least > > until there's replacement. Ideally, the new model shouldn't enforce which > > of fbcon or userland console one uses. > > Why does general purpose mode setting need to be in the kernel? It's a 100K of To enable fallback to kernel debugger when your user app crashes. Also, to enable different apps to share safely the graphic resources. > code. We're only talking about about the few seconds between power-on and early > user space starting. After we get early user-space I use it to run the mode code > in user space. Debugging early boot becomes quite impossible? > Note that the new model only applies to DRM devices. Everthing else would > continue with the old code. What is exactly a DRM device? -- Nicholas Souchu - [email protected] - [email protected]