Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?

On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 18:23, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:

> I am using mozilla, KDE Desktop, OpenOffice, KMail and other
> programs over a 56k modem connection on a daily basis  --  it
> doesn't even consume all the bandwidth! I guess  20 - 40k
> would suffice for most of the time.
> 
> However, I don't use plain X. I fell into the beautiful NX
> trap offered by http://www.nomachine.com/ and can't live
> without any more.

How does NX compare to simply using SSH to compress the tunneled X
traffic?  If NX can safely eliminate round trips to the server, then I'm
all for it.  Why is it not a standard part of X11 if it can do such a
good job of eliminating round trips and compression?  Any remote X
displays (even on a fast network) could benefit from that.

Michael


> 
> Mozilla 1.6 over a 9.6k GSM Modem link requires 5 minutes to
> startup and takes 4.000 roundtrips if I use plain-ol' X.
> Unusable -- true.
> 
> Same Mozilla 1.6, again over a 9.6k GSM Modem link, but this
> time turbo-powered by NX differential compression takes only
> 20 seconds to startup and sends only a dozen roundtrips if
> across the wire, ahem ether.
> 
> KDE-3.2 to "boot" transfers 4.8 MByte of data until the
> desktop is there (after KDM login), if running through
> vanilla X.
> 
> Same KDE-3.2 to boot across the "NX wondertool" transfers
> only 38 kBytes of data.
> 
> All numbers taken 30 minutes ago.
> 
> HTH,
> Kurt
> 
> > -- Matt Jones
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xserver mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xserver
-- 
Michael L Torrie <torriem-1ghGyg2U9Gn2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]>