Re: troubleshooting guide
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Grahame Bowland wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 20:07, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >>On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 18:51, Torgeir Veimo wrote: >> >>>Xati says; >>> >>>Using ATI card: ATI Radeon RV200 LW at pci:0000:01:00.0 >>>Screen: 16/16 depth/bpp >>> >>>/etc/grub.conf; >>> >>>[...] video=vesa:ywrap,mtrr vga=834 >>> >>>Will it run faster if I use radeonfb instead of vesafb? >> >>AFAIK it doesn't care. >> >>You need to build with --enable-dri and run a recent DRM from DRI CVS >>for compositing to be accelerated. > > > I'm also on an IBM Thinkpad, this one is a T-41 with a Radeon 9000 > Mobility.. > > I built the kernel module for DRM from this CVS source: > http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Building > > and I recompiled xserver from CVS. Everything is still slow (much slower > than Xvesa); is there any way to tell if Xati is actually trying to use > DRI? It doesn't say anything about it on the command line. > > Interestingly, I get: > [drm] Initialized radeon 1.9.0 20020828 on minor 0 > from the 2.6.4-rc1 inbuilt DRM, and: > [drm] Initialized radeon 1.10.0 20020828 on minor 0: ATI Radeon Lf R250 > Mobility 9000 M9 > from CVS DRM. I have no idea why the version is lower in CVS? I had to manually rename the radeon module compile to by dripkg's install script from radeon.o to radeon.ko with kernel 2.6.*. Which kernel do you run? When Xati starts it will print out if dri is available or not if compiled with the --enable-dri param. -- -Torgeir