Re: Difficulties trying bind as user to openLDAP

Martin Pauly via Freeradius-Users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freeradius.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 07.03.25 um 14:44 schrieb Alan DeKok:
> PAP is the best choice.
> You have to update the supplicant to allow EAP-TTLS-PAP.

citing myself 1 hour ago:
>> Agreed. In real life,it turns out that, as a remainder of the MS monopoly,
>> _all_ vendors of WiFi clients MUST support and test MS-CHAPv2 properly to
>> survive commercially -- counterexamples welcome 🙂
>> They MAY support PAP in addition. With a server side not speaking MS-CHAPv2,
>> odds are your life gets harder, especially if you're running a BYOD service. 

Depending on the mixture (and number!) of clients, the support effort
caused by not supporting the seemingly ubiquitous MS-CHAPv2 may warrant
some effort on the server side :-( We enhanced our password update procedure
by calculating the NT-Hash ourselves whenever a user changes their password.
We store it in LDAP, FR pulls it to do MS-CHAPv2 without any Microsoft thing involved.
This is 100% reliable, but 10% of the security you really want as NT-Hash is
so easily cracked.

If you stick with PAP, you might want to take a look at
https://codeberg.org/Amebis/GEANTLink for balky Windows clients.
We used this tool around 2017 for a while before we figured out above solution.
The developer is still around, and there seems to be some maintenance activity
on the code.

Cheers, Martin

-- 
   Dr. Martin Pauly     Phone:  +49-6421-28-23527
   HRZ Univ. Marburg    Fax:    +49-6421-28-26994
   Hans-Meerwein-Str.   E-Mail: [email protected]
   D-35032 Marburg

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 4.4 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.