Re: Way to verify RADIUS status-server of proxy server over RadSec / TLS

Dominic Stalder <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freeradius.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Alan

thanks for your feedback.

> That should be fine.
> Uh, what?
> No.  They're just RADIUS packets over TLS.  There is no 2 byte length prefix.

That is, what I assumed as well and was told by our upsream RADIUS provider as well.


> socat might work.  Did you try it?  If so, what happened?

I tried indeed and got this output:

root@id-radiustest1:~# socat -v OPENSSL:130.59.31.25:2083,cert=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec-id-radius.unibe.ch.pem,key=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec-id-radius.unibe.ch.key,cafile=/etc/freeradius/certs/edupki-root-ca-cert.pem,verify=0 UDP-RECV:11812
< 2025/05/08 19:56:11.230844  length=38 from=0 to=37
\f..&\f..Z8 .F@./....%P..p......|..y...x> 2025/05/08 19:56:11.233741  length=38 from=0 to=37
...&J...UGM..A...:.4P.<..\r\bdq....]....2025/05/08 19:56:11 socat[2226675] E sendto(7, 0x55d313d26000, 38, 0, AF=0 "<anon>", 0): Invalid argument
root@id-radiustest1:~# socat -v OPENSSL:130.59.31.25:2083,cert=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec-id-radius.unibe.ch.pem,key=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec-id-radius.unibe.ch.key,cafile=/etc/freeradius/certs/edupki-root-ca-cert.pem,verify=0 UDP-RECV:11812
< 2025/05/08 19:56:56.736886  length=38 from=0 to=37
\f..&...\v....4..JC...P..MJjf.0*.......e> 2025/05/08 19:56:56.739755  length=38 from=0 to=37
...&.44../5.jB
..\f.`P..M.&d.L_.2..R%.n2025/05/08 19:56:56 socat[2226678] E sendto(7, 0x55b73ba0a000, 38, 0, AF=0 "<anon>", 0): Invalid argument

To be honest, I let this interpret by an AI and this is what the AI told me: "You’re trying to receive UDP packets on port 11812 and send them via TLS/TCP using socat. That conceptually makes sense — it’s what RADIUS-over-TLS (RadSec) does — but unfortunately, RADIUS over TLS is not just “UDP in TLS over TCP”. RadSec uses a specific framing: each RADIUS packet must be prefixed with a 2-byte length field when encapsulated over TCP/TLS (per RFC 6614).“


> Or, set up a local RADIUS proxy which accepts UDP, and sends packets over TLS to the remote server.

I read about the radsecproxy application, to achieve this. But would it also be possible to use my FreeRADIUS instance for this; this does exactly this: receives RADIUS / UDP packets and sends them for „unknown“ realms to the proxy server over RadSec / TLS. But is it also possible, to proxy somehow the RADIUS status-server messages like this?


 > But this doesn't really tell you a lot.  If your proxy is sending packets to the remote server, just check the stats and logs on your local proxy.  It will complain if the remote server is down.

I am already extrackting the FreeRADIUS stats from our FreeRADIUS servers and return them to PRTG (our monitoring tool) as well and show them there graphically:

cat <<EOF | radclient -x localhost:18121 status adminsecret
FreeRADIUS-Statistics-Type = ALL
Message-Authenticator = 0x00
EOF“

I would need to have a look at the different stats there and decide, if I can create an alarming based on them.

But if - by any chance - there is a way to achieve it with the given „tools“ (like our FreeRADIUS server itself), I would like to get that path; also out of curiosity.

Regards
Dominic

> Am 08.05.2025 um 20:49 schrieb Alan DeKok <[email protected]>:
> 
> On May 8, 2025, at 2:31 PM, Dominic Stalder <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Recently, we migrated some of our RADIUS proxy servers from RADIUS (UDP) to RadSec (TCP) and I would like to still be able to monitor the upstream proxy servers.
>> 
>> When we were still using RADIUS (UDP), I was able to send a status-server RADIUS message to the upstream server directly, like this and report that back to PRTG (our monitoring tool):
>> 
>> echo 'Message-Authenticator = 0x00' | radclient -x 1.2.3.4 status secret
>> 
>> Now I would like to achieve something similar, after we migrated the proxy server 1.2.3.4 to TLS only.
> 
>  It's a little more complex, but it shouldn't be hard.
> 
>> My initial try was to setup something like this:
>> 
>> 1. start a local socat listener on port UDP/11812 and tunnel it to 
>> 
>> socat -v OPENSSL:1.2.3.4:2083,cert=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec.pem,key=/etc/freeradius/certs/radsec.key,cafile=/etc/freeradius/certs/edupki-root-ca-cert.pem,verify=0 UDP-RECV:11812
>> 
>> 
>> 2. send a standard RADIUS (UDP) status-server packet to the localhost port UDP/11812:
>> 
>> echo 'Message-Authenticator = 0x00' | radclient -x localhost:11812 status radsec -t 1
> 
>  That should be fine.
> 
>> 3. unfortunately, this isn’t straight forward:
>> 
>> You’re trying to receive UDP packets on port 11812 and send them via TLS/TCP using socat. That conceptually makes sense — it’s what RADIUS-over-TLS (RadSec) does — but unfortunately, RADIUS over TLS is not just “UDP in TLS over TCP”. RadSec uses a specific framing: each RADIUS packet must be prefixed with a 2-byte length field when encapsulated over TCP/TLS (per RFC 6614).
> 
>  Uh, what?
> 
>  No.  They're just RADIUS packets over TLS.  There is no 2 byte length prefix.
> 
>> Does anybody have an idea, how to implement a simple RadSec / TLS status-server test, maybe with a „workaround“ or a detour over the FreeRADIUS configuration?
> 
>  socat might work.  Did you try it?  If so, what happened?
> 
>  Or, set up a local RADIUS proxy which accepts UDP, and sends packets over TLS to the remote server.
> 
>  But this doesn't really tell you a lot.  If your proxy is sending packets to the remote server, just check the stats and logs on your local proxy.  It will complain if the remote server is down.
> 
>  Alan DeKok.
> 
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.