Re: Option82 - question about sending sub-options
Alan DeKok via Freeradius-Users <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:46:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freeradius.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nick looked into it, it works in 3.2.8. > On Sep 25, 2025, at 2:33 PM, Ľudovít Mikula via Freeradius-Users <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > is there any estimate when it might land in 3.2.x branch? > > Ludo > > On 18. 9. 2025 16:37, Alan DeKok via Freeradius-Users wrote: >> On Sep 18, 2025, at 8:55 AM, Ľudovít Mikula <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have a question about sending Option82 - I am setting sub-options 1,2 and 9 in response to DISCOVER: >>> >>> update reply { >>> &DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id := &request:DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id >>> &DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id := &request:DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id >>> &DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information := &request:DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information >>> } >>> >>> >>> and see it being set in the freeradius log: >>> >>> (1702) DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id := 0xacdb489f87af >>> (1702) DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id := 0xacdb489f87af >>> (1702) DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information := 0x0000118b060104010203010000061b34030a444d5a2d434f532d3032010e4554492d5250442d504f52542d300207756e69636173740e07000100000079000d040a666f07 >>> ... >>> However the relay agent vendor requires the sub-options to be set in one Option 82 block (like they send it to us in DISCOVER): >>> .. >>> Is this possible (or am I doing something wrong), we're using freeradius v3.2.3 ? >> We can push a fix, but it will have to go into 3.2.9. >> Alan DeKok. >> - >> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html