Re: [EXT] Re: Copying User-Name from inner tunnel to outer for accounting
Brian Julin <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:40:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freeradius.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SJ0PR03MB7079241BF72CA64D1D8C604EB4C22@SJ0PR03MB7079.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> |
Matthew Newton via Freeradius-Users <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no need to try and look out for the right bit of debug output to > send. People nearly always send what they think is useful, which often > isn't (or not complete enough), and then we get annoyed about not having > the right information to be able to help. This happens a lot, hence the > rapid descent into frustration. I think there are two factors that keep people from doing so, and both share the same root cause: the debug information is usually an immense really ugly looking thing that A) they would not normally post on a discussion/chat for fear of being "messy", and most people these days grew up with discussions/chats so they view a mailing list through that lens and B) Is full of details about what is most often a component of security infrastructure, where there is a concern about exposure requiring them to consider how to redact some details, some of which may not be amenable to a simple search/replace. Some sort of interactive post-processor for the debug input to pretty it up, clean out the true cruft, perform redactions/aliasing on any exposed server names or addresses, and maybe point out a few common issues if it sees them... might be a worthwhile endeavor. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html