Re: Re: Radeon 9200 and interlace
"Jamie McLaughlin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.games.mame.advancemame.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004701c4e1e9$8311d4f0$cb1aa78f@HRI3> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Adrian" <adrianm-CWaTaxNTjqzV5dz/[email protected]> To: <advancemame-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:19 AM Subject: [advancemame-users] Re: Radeon 9200 and interlace >I did a quick look at the svgalib source and found that there is a flag >that in the drivers that control if the vertical values should be halved >for interlace modes (INTERLACE_DIVIDE_VERT). >The INTERLACE_DIVIDE_VERT flag is set for all r128 & radeon boards. > >Based on the output (only first half of the lines is displayed) my guess >is that the radeon9200 shouldn't have this flag set. > >I will compile a new advmame and test it tonight. > >Still doens't explain why advv says that interlace is not supported. > Did you ever get a chance to try this out? I looked at the source and noticed that the INTERLACE_DIVIDE_VERT flag only appears in the svgalib source directory - will changing it therefore affect my setup, which uses framebuffer graphics? If not, where would I implement a similar fix for the framebuffer? Also, on my radeon setup, advv says (and has always said) that intrerlace *is* supported - it's just that in practice it is broken and only shows the top half of the screen twice! Best Regards, Jamie ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ Unsubscribe at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/advancemame-users