Re: eval vs. exec
Eugene <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.games.mud.client.lyntin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:29:57 -0500 (CDT) will guaraldi <[email protected]> wrote: > >I'd rather not provide an empty default lyntinuser in the >modules >directory. If you do a site installation of Lyntin, the >admin would have >to remove the lyntinuser module from the modules >directory in order to >allow users to create their own. I think that's too much >of a runaround. I believe the custom module, if any, would silently override the default one. I agree, though, the default is not needed to provide the empty symbol dictionary. >I like the warning there. It lets people know that they >should be running >their python commands in a lyntinuser module that they >create. Oops, I've just removed it. Ok, I will put it back; but the message is plain wrong - the code snippet is not executing in "advanced" module context. (And why would a user want to execute a code in the "advanced" context?) In fact, it's executed in an empty context. Put the warning back yourself, or let me know what text it should have, and I'll put it there. -- Eugene --- Professional hosting for everyone - http://www.host.ru ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click