Re: Re: linesep char

Okay, hint taken :)  Now, if one were to rewrite this, what would be the
right way to rewrite it?  One way would be to allow configuring of just
the linesep character(s).  Another would be to allow configuration of
not the linesep character, but instead of the *escape* character, and hardcode
the linesep character to '<escapechar>;', and a literal <escapechar> as 
<escapechar><escapechar>. \, %, and $ are all popular escape chars.

So what opinions do people have?

  --pj

On Monday, Apr 19, 2004, will guaraldi writes:
>
>It's been on the wishlist for a year or more, but it's not really in my
>priority list.  I think the only way it will get done is for someone to
>send in a patch.
>
>So if someone is interested in working through this, then the chances of
>this thing being made configurable are very high.  Possibly even for 4.1.
>Otherwise, the chances are very low that it'll get fixed in the forseeable
>future.
>
>/will
>
>
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Paul Jimenez wrote:
>>
>> Any chance of getting this thing made configurable?  or for 5.0 maybe?
>>
>>  --pj
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
>Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
>GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
>administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Lyntin-devl mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lyntin-devl
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click