leading whitespace

> 
> The only problem that I can see with this is where a command or alias
> is
> the same as a mud command, then stripping leading whitespace would
> prevent one from dealing with the conflict by using a leading space to
> send the mud command and no leading space to excute the lyntin
> command/alias. Of course the whole whitespace thing could be made
> configurable to allow folks to choose for themselves.
>
> -davidc

The issue is exactly that: what if the command with a leading whitespace
is significant to mud server?  Now we have a very simple rule: if the
first letter is whitespace, then the command is directed to the remote
server. It's possible of course to make it configurable, but I don't
think it's worth complication. 

-- 
Eugene


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt